Bitcoin’s Institutional Integration: Store of Value or Transactional Currency?

Briefing Notes

My 'briefing notes' summarize the content of podcast episodes; they do not reflect my own views. If you have comments about this briefing note, please leave a comment below (requires signing up for a free blog subscription). Note that some of the podcast episodes I summarize may be sponsored: don't trust, verify, if the information you are looking for is to be used for decision-making.

Summary

In the September 30, 2024 episode of The Bitcoin Layer, the fourth and last of the series on teaching Bitcoin, Michael Howell asks Nik Bhatia his lingering questions about the evolving role of Bitcoin as a store of value, akin to digital gold. The discussion centers around Bitcoin’s taxation challenges, its competition with stablecoins, and the growing institutionalization of Bitcoin through custody solutions offered by financial giants like Bank of New York Mellon. Key insights include Bitcoin’s potential supply constraints due to lost coins, the cyclical effects of halving events on price, and the uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin's regulatory future.

Take-Home Messages

1. Bitcoin is evolving as digital gold, positioned more as a long-term store of value than a transactional currency.
2. Stablecoins dominate in regions with unstable fiat currencies, posing a challenge to Bitcoin’s broader transactional adoption.
3. Institutional adoption is growing, but custody services offered by financial institutions may shift Bitcoin control away from users.
4. Bitcoin’s price remains sensitive to supply constraints, with lost coins and halvings influencing long-term price appreciation.
5. Regulatory clarity is needed, particularly in tax treatment and legal frameworks, to foster wider Bitcoin adoption.

Overview

Nik Bhatia and Michael Howell begin by addressing Bitcoin's complex regulatory and taxation environment, particularly the treatment of Bitcoin as property under U.S. tax law. This classification, they argue, creates significant friction for Bitcoin’s use as a transactional currency, as every purchase made with Bitcoin is subject to capital gains tax. Both speakers highlight ongoing legislative efforts to exempt small Bitcoin transactions from such taxes, which could expand Bitcoin's utility in daily commerce. However, they agree that Bitcoin’s real strength lies in its function as a store of value rather than as a replacement for fiat currency.

The conversation shifts to Bitcoin’s competition with stablecoins in regions with unstable currencies, such as Nigeria. In these markets, stablecoins are more commonly used for transactions, while Bitcoin is primarily held as a reserve asset. Howell argues that Bitcoin is fulfilling a role akin to digital gold, attracting a younger generation of investors who view it as a hedge against inflation and economic instability. Despite this, Bitcoin’s adoption for daily transactions remains limited, especially where stablecoins offer a more stable alternative.

Another critical theme is the growing institutional involvement in Bitcoin. Bhatia emphasizes that the entry of financial giants like Fidelity and Bank of New York Mellon into Bitcoin custody services marks a turning point in Bitcoin’s institutionalization. While this provides legitimacy and security for investors, Howell raises concerns that such custodianship could undermine Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos by concentrating control in the hands of financial institutions. The speakers also touch on the issue of Bitcoin supply attrition, noting that a significant portion of Bitcoin may be lost or inaccessible, which could affect future price dynamics.

The final topic centers on Bitcoin’s price cycles, particularly the impact of halving events. Historically, Bitcoin prices have surged following halving events, and both speakers expect future halvings to continue driving price appreciation. They also discuss how mining costs vary globally due to differences in energy prices, suggesting that Bitcoin’s future price will be influenced not only by supply constraints but also by the efficiency of mining operations.

Stakeholder Perspectives

• Retail Investors: Likely to benefit from Bitcoin’s increasing status as digital gold, though volatility tied to halving cycles may remain a concern.
• Institutional Investors: The involvement of trusted custodians like Bank of New York Mellon signals increasing confidence in Bitcoin, providing institutions with secure storage options.
• Policymakers: The need for clear regulatory frameworks is paramount, especially concerning the taxation of small Bitcoin transactions and the legal distinction between Bitcoin and stablecoins.
• Bitcoin Enthusiasts: May view institutional custody services as a threat to Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos, as control over assets shifts to large financial institutions.

Implications

For investors, Bitcoin’s growing institutionalization could lead to greater price stability and mainstream acceptance, but it also raises concerns about centralization. Institutional custody services, while convenient, may erode Bitcoin’s original ethos of individual control over assets, posing a philosophical challenge to long-time Bitcoin supporters. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s regulatory future remains uncertain, particularly with regard to tax treatment and stablecoin competition, both of which could shape Bitcoin’s long-term adoption trajectory.

From a market perspective, the combination of Bitcoin’s supply constraints—due to lost coins and halving cycles—and its institutional adoption is likely to continue driving price volatility. This presents both opportunities and risks for investors. Finally, the growing competition between Bitcoin and stablecoins, particularly in regions with unstable fiat currencies, suggests that Bitcoin’s role as a transactional currency may remain limited unless its volatility and tax barriers are addressed.

Future Outlook

Bitcoin’s future as a long-term store of value appears secure, especially among younger generations who are more likely to view it as digital gold than as a medium of exchange. However, its adoption for daily transactions is likely to remain constrained unless regulatory and tax barriers are addressed. In the next decade, Bitcoin’s institutional adoption will continue to grow, with financial institutions offering increasingly sophisticated custody solutions for investors. However, the risk of centralization will need to be managed carefully to ensure that Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos is not undermined.

The cyclical nature of Bitcoin’s price movements, driven by halvings, will remain a key factor influencing its market dynamics. As more institutional capital flows into Bitcoin, its price volatility may decrease, but the risk of speculative bubbles will persist. Regulatory clarity, particularly around tax treatment and stablecoins, will be crucial to Bitcoin’s broader adoption, especially in markets where stablecoins currently dominate. Ultimately, Bitcoin’s future will depend on its ability to balance its role as a store of value with the practical needs of users in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.

Information Gaps

1. How would exempting small Bitcoin transactions from capital gains tax affect Bitcoin's adoption as a medium of exchange? Exempting small Bitcoin transactions from capital gains tax could remove a significant barrier to its use in daily transactions. This question is crucial for understanding whether Bitcoin can evolve beyond its current role as a store of value into a more widely used medium of exchange.
2. What are the key factors influencing the shift from Bitcoin as a currency to Bitcoin as digital gold? This question addresses the fundamental drivers behind Bitcoin’s evolving perception and usage. It is important for investors and analysts seeking to understand the factors that may limit or accelerate Bitcoin’s adoption as a transactional currency.
3. What risks and benefits do institutional custody solutions pose to Bitcoin's decentralization ethos? As more financial institutions enter the Bitcoin custody space, this question explores the balance between convenience and decentralization. It is key for understanding how institutionalization may affect Bitcoin's core principles of user control and decentralization.
4. How does the loss of a significant percentage of Bitcoin affect its liquidity and long-term price stability? The attrition of Bitcoin due to lost keys presents a unique supply-side issue. Investigating this question is critical for understanding how Bitcoin’s supply dynamics may influence long-term liquidity and price trends.
5. How could varying global regulations on Bitcoin’s legal and tax status affect its adoption across different markets? Regulatory clarity is essential for Bitcoin’s broader adoption. This question addresses how different legal and tax frameworks could either foster or hinder Bitcoin’s integration into global financial markets.

Broader Implications

Regulatory Clarity and Adoption Barriers

Bitcoin’s regulatory future, especially regarding tax exemptions for small transactions, will shape its usability as a medium of exchange. Without clear regulatory frameworks, adoption for everyday use may be slow, especially in regions with complex tax laws. Consistent regulation will be essential to fostering broader Bitcoin adoption while preserving its innovative potential.

Bitcoin Supply Constraints and Price Volatility

The loss of a significant portion of Bitcoin due to lost private keys limits its effective supply, creating potential future scarcity. This supply constraint, combined with cyclical halving events, may drive price volatility. Investors must navigate these dynamics as part of their risk assessment when considering long-term Bitcoin investments.

Bitcoin’s Competition with Stablecoins

Stablecoins, especially in regions with unstable fiat currencies, present a challenge to Bitcoin’s use in daily transactions. Bitcoin’s volatility and taxation issues make it less appealing for everyday users in these markets. For Bitcoin to compete with stablecoins, regulatory frameworks and volatility management must improve.